@Steinar @jwildeboer can we not use the word "viral" to describe "copyleft"?

It's a Microsoft-invented term to make copyleft licenses sound bad.

Language matters.

@rysiek If any licenses are viral its proprietary ones. @Steinar@snabelen.no @jwildeboer

@pettter @rysiek @Steinar @jwildeboer sorry, I don't understand. Are you hinting that proprietary licenses are viral?


@paoloredaelli In any sense that copyleft licenses are viral, so are proprietary ones, and often more.

· · Web · 1 · 3 · 2

@pettter @paoloredaelli The whole "viral" argument is IMHO planted by proprietary vendors long ago to attack FOSS. It is a term that should never be used it only helps "them".

@jwildeboer @pettter I know, I'm aware of that FUD. A license that solidly protects user rights is persistent, like GPL, LGPL and AGPL.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon @ UMU

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!